Logan Darklighter wrote:
I think Bluemage is perfectly on target on what should happen. I agree 100% and have made almost those exact same arguments before. I don't think the government should be involved at all in defining "marriage". I think civil unions for all in order to have the legal side of things be the same for everyone would be great.


There'd be an outcry from those people that don't want gays to get married (because it'd "lessen the sacrament of marriage") but think it's okay for them to have civil unions. To them, they (marriage and civil unions) are two separate things, and the civil union is the lesser one. (I don't agree with them, btw. I think it's a good idea.)